This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The significance of the case of United States v. Granderson (1994 ) is that it clarified: A) what ... (Read 20 times)

rayancarla1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
The significance of the case of United States v. Granderson (1994 ) is that it clarified:
 
  A) what can happen to a probationer whose community sentence is revoked.
  B) the minimum and maximum sentence lengths for probation.
  C) that probation cannot be revoked due to the inability to pay one's fines.
  D) when counsel is mandated for a revocation hearing.
  E) it clarified the role of the warden in grating probation.

Question 2

A suspect's intent to rob the bank satisfies the _________ requirements for a conviction.
 
  A) mens rea
  B) actus reus
  C) Strict liability
  D) reckless endangerment
  E) culpability



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

heyhey123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 353
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A




rayancarla1

  • Member
  • Posts: 571
Reply 2 on: Aug 13, 2018
Excellent


AISCAMPING

  • Member
  • Posts: 347
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

One way to reduce acid reflux is to lose two or three pounds. Most people lose weight in the belly area first when they increase exercise, meaning that heartburn can be reduced quickly by this method.

Did you know?

Symptoms of kidney problems include a loss of appetite, back pain (which may be sudden and intense), chills, abdominal pain, fluid retention, nausea, the urge to urinate, vomiting, and fever.

Did you know?

The first oral chemotherapy drug for colon cancer was approved by FDA in 2001.

Did you know?

Amphetamine poisoning can cause intravascular coagulation, circulatory collapse, rhabdomyolysis, ischemic colitis, acute psychosis, hyperthermia, respiratory distress syndrome, and pericarditis.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library