The importance of Ring v. Arizona is that it ruled that: A) ...

[scienceeasy]

The importance of Ring v. Arizona is that it ruled that:
 
  A) the death penalty is unconstitutional in crimes of burglary and robbery.
  B) juries, not judges, must make the decision to sentence a convict to death.
  C) judges must give victims a chance to speak during the sentencing phase of a death penalty case.
  D) death penalty defendants may not present new evidence during the sentencing phase.
  E) wardens can not pardon death row inmates.

Question 2

Warden Smith supervises 2000 male inmates who are incarcerated for various reasons, including murder, rape, robbery, drugs, theft, and arson. He meets with every inmate who is sentenced to his prison to get an understanding of where each inmate came from and how he can possibly prevent recidivism.Warden Smith also reviews the background and criminal history of all offenders who enter his prison. He notices a common theme- many of his inmates began offending at a very early age and they continued to offend well into adulthood. These inmates would be considered:
 
  A) adolescent-limited offenders.
  B) active persisters.
  C) passive persisters.
  D) life-course persisters.
  E) learned behavior offenders.

[tuate]

Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

D