According to Von Hirsch's view on just desserts, why is ...

[Charlie]

According to Von Hirsch's view on just desserts, why is punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation wrong?
 
  a. Punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation does not allow for the possibility of rehabilitation.
  b. Punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation is used only within the adult criminal justice system, thus, it ignores juvenile offenders.
  c. Punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation involves an offender's future actions.
  d. Von Hirsch did not view punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation as wrong.

Question 2

There are two kinds of challenges the prosecutor and the defense lawyer can use when selecting a jury. What are they and how do these challenges differ? Which challenge is bad for the defendant, and why?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

[helenmarkerine]

Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

The two kinds of challenges the prosecutor and the defense lawyer can use when
selecting a jury are challenges for cause and peremptory challenges. They differ in
that challenges for cause require that there be legal reasons to challenge to exclude
a potential juror, while peremptory challenges are challenges to exclude a potential
juror for which no reason is stated. The peremptory challenge is bad for the
defendant because the prosecutor may use his peremptory challenges to remove
potential jurors the defendant would like to have on the jury.

[Charlie]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[bdobbins]

Gracias!