Concerning the law of interrogating terrorist suspects: a. it ...

[darbym82]

Concerning the law of interrogating terrorist suspects:
 
  a. it is clear that the U.S. Constitution requires terrorist suspects be treated the same as criminal suspects.
  b. the definition of what constitutes torture is clear.
  c. there is no clear definition of torture or what violates the Constitution.
  d. there is consensus that torture is legal when interrogating persons suspects of planning terrorist acts onAmerican soil.

Question 2

In the case, Rasul v. Bush (2004), the Supreme Court ruled:
 
  a. that noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants and detained in areas controlled bythe U.S. cannot petition for habeas corpus in federal courts.
 b. that noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants and detained in areas controlled bythe U.S. can petition for habeas corpus in federal courts.
 c. that noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants must be tried in federal courts in theU.S.
 d. that the right to habeas corpus is suspended during war time.

[babybsemail]

Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

b

[darbym82]

TY

[babybsemail]

You're welcome