This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Detail five possible negative effects of the exclusionary rule. What will be an ideal ... (Read 47 times)

jasdeep_brar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Detail five possible negative effects of the exclusionary rule.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Explain five exceptions to the exclusionary rule.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

yasmina

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

Possible negative effects of the exclusionary rule include:
court delay
diversion of resources from trials to suppression hearings
weakening of the Fourth Amendment guarantees by judges reluctant to exclude
evidence
encouragement of plea bargaining
empowerment of corrupt police officers to immunize criminals by botching searches
imposition of extrajudicial punishment by officers who find themselves unable to
secure convictions lawfully
fostering false testimony by police officers

Answer to Question 2

There are five major exceptions to the exclusionary rule: collateral use, cross
examination, attenuation of taint, independent source and inevitable discovery, and
reasonable good faith exception.
The collateral use exception allows the use of illegally obtained evidence in nontrial
proceedings such as bail hearings, preliminary hearings, grand jury proceedings and
habeas corpus proceedings. The cross examination exception means that while the
government cannot use illegally obtained evidence in the case in chief, it can be used to
impeach the credibility of a defendant's testimony.
The attenuation exception says that illegally obtained evidence can still be admitted if
the poisonous connection between illegal police actions and the evidence obtained
through these actions are weak enough. The Supreme Court has not established a
bright-line rule for when this is so; each case must be considered in its own
circumstances.
Under the independent source exception, if police officers violate the Constitution
looking for evidence and then in a totally separate matter lawfully get the same
evidence it can still be admitted. As for the inevitable discovery exception, if police get
the evidence through illegal activity but would have eventually found it through nonillegal activity, then the exclusionary rule does not apply.
Finally, under the good faith exception, if police officers act honestly and reasonably on
the belief that they have a lawfully-issued warrant or some other means of searching
or arresting a suspect, then even if the warrant or other means later on turns out to be
defective, the exclusionary rule will not apply to exclude the evidence.




jasdeep_brar

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
Reply 2 on: Aug 16, 2018
Excellent


bbburns21

  • Member
  • Posts: 336
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Nearly all drugs pass into human breast milk. How often a drug is taken influences the amount of drug that will pass into the milk. Medications taken 30 to 60 minutes before breastfeeding are likely to be at peak blood levels when the baby is nursing.

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

Did you know?

Drugs are in development that may cure asthma and hay fever once and for all. They target leukotrienes, which are known to cause tightening of the air passages in the lungs and increase mucus productions in nasal passages.

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library