According to the Supreme Court in Katz v. U.S., involving an ...

[waynest]

According to the Supreme Court in Katz v. U.S., involving an electronic listening and recording device attached to the outside of a public telephone booth:
 
  a. the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.
  b. a subjective expectation of privacy confers the Fourth Amendment's protection.
  c. there is no search unless there has been a physical intrusion into a place.
  d. eavesdropping on a public phone booth is not a search.

Question 2

The first part of a writ of assistance, where royal agents can search anyone, anywhere, anytime, is referred to as a _______ warrant.
 
  a. general
  b. constitutional
  c. privacy
  d. specific

[mceravolo]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

a

[waynest]

TY

[mceravolo]

You're welcome