Author Question: Which court case resulted in a ruling that because of the special relationship between a parole ... (Read 33 times)

Engineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Which court case resulted in a ruling that because of the special relationship between a parole officer and a parolee with a history of brutal violence against women, appropriate warnings to employers and other persons foreseeably at risk are required?
 
  a. Reiser v. District of Columbia
  b. Reiser v. Wade
  c. Wade v. Roe
  d. Samson v. California

Question 2

Which of the following is not an element in a negligence action?
 
  a. A legal duty is owed to the plaintiff.
  b. There is a violation of that duty by an act or omission to act, which constitutes a breach of that duty.
  c. That act or omission was the proximate cause for the injury or damage suffered by the plaintiff.
  d. All of the above are elements in a negligence action.


essyface1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Answer to Question 1

Answer: a

Answer to Question 2

Answer: d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Engineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again




 

Did you know?

In most climates, 8 to 10 glasses of water per day is recommended for adults. The best indicator for adequate fluid intake is frequent, clear urination.

Did you know?

The average office desk has 400 times more bacteria on it than a toilet.

Did you know?

Every 10 seconds, a person in the United States goes to the emergency room complaining of head pain. About 1.2 million visits are for acute migraine attacks.

Did you know?

HIV testing reach is still limited. An estimated 40% of people with HIV (more than 14 million) remain undiagnosed and do not know their infection status.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library