Discuss the 1970 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District ruling in Menechino v. Oswald and the implications that it had for inmates seeking parole.
What will be an ideal response?
Question 2
Matching
1. Greenholtz v. Inmates
2. Menechino v. Oswald
3. Martinez v. California
4. Commutation
5. Conditional release
6. Consolidated model
7. Executive clemency
8. Immunity
9. Pardon
10. Reprieve
a. Ruled that a parole proceeding is nonadversarial in nature because both parties, the board and the inmate, have the same concern rehabilitation
b. Affirmed the constitutionality of statutory provisions that provide parole officials with immunity from tort claims
c. Ruled that the Constitution does not require that an inmate be given the opportunity to participate in parole board hearings
d. Release from prison based on the accumulation of time off for good behavior and requiring the release to abide by certain regulations
e. A pardon, reprieve or commutation
f. An act of executive clemency that has the effect of releasing an inmate from prison and/or removing certain legal disabilities from persons convicted of crimes
g. A shortening of sentence provided by a governor or U.S. president
h. An exemption from a civil or criminal action
i. Temporary stay of the execution of a sentence to allow more time for judicial review
j. System in which parole is incorporated into a corrections department
wild discuss fish
When the United States gets stuck over a controversial issue—usually something a divided Congress ca
In 2013, Americans learned that the federal government massively surveys their phone calls and e-mai
Portuguese Warrior Surrounded by Manillas, Court of Benin, Nigeria.
This Russian godfather is leaving a Moscow court just after he was acquitted of a double murder. Do ...
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970