Author Question: Explain the California Supreme Courts ruling in Ingersoll v. Palmer, 743 P.2d. 1299 (1987). What ... (Read 108 times)

olgavictoria

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
Explain the California Supreme Courts ruling in Ingersoll v. Palmer, 743 P.2d. 1299 (1987).
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Explain the facts of the Terry v. Ohio case.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



abctaiwan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 355
Answer to Question 1

Thank you

Answer to Question 2

Answer: Officer McFadden testified that he observed three men casing a business. He believed that he had
reasonable suspicion to stop a crime before it was about to happen. Due to the nature if the crime the
officer patted the suspects down and found two handguns. The U.S. Supreme Court allowed this search
and this created what was called the Terry stop.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

In 1844, Charles Goodyear obtained the first patent for a rubber condom.

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

Cucumber slices relieve headaches by tightening blood vessels, reducing blood flow to the area, and relieving pressure.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library