Author Question: The decision in Pennsylvania v. Mimms: a. allows officers to frisk suspects' outer clothing. b. ... (Read 20 times)

clmills979 · **on:** Aug 17, 2018

The decision in Pennsylvania v. Mimms:

a. allows officers to frisk suspects' outer clothing.
b. authorize the police to stop suspicious-looking individuals based on less than reasonable suspicion.
c. allows an officer to demand identification from citizens.
d. authorizes a police officer to order a driver out of a car.

Question 2

Which of the following are considered restrictions on frisks?

a. Frisks are to be nothing more than pat-downs of outer clothing.
b. Frisks must be motivated by a desire to preserve officer safety.
c. For an officer to legally seize an item during the course of a frisk, the item to be seized must be immediately apparent to the officer as contraband.
d. All of the above