Eyewitness identifications were held admissible in Neil v. ...

[Mimi]

Eyewitness identifications were held admissible in Neil v. Biggers (1972 ) and Manson v. Brathwaite (1977 ) because they were not suggestive.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In an analysis by Burdon (2004), that examined general predictors in aftercare and 12 month return to prison rates, it was found that:
 
  A) Volunteering for treatment was a significant predictor of participation in aftercare
   B) Involuntarily treatment was a significant predictor of participation in aftercare
   C) Motivation for treatment was a significant predictor of participation in aftercare
   D) Family support was a significant predictor of participation in aftercare
   E) Criminal history was a significant predictor of participation in aftercare

[dreamfighter72]

Answer to Question 1

FALSE COMMENT: Their suggestibility was overcome by reliability factors

Answer to Question 2

C

[Mimi]

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

[patma1981]

Gracias!