Author Question: If police deliberately violate the constitutionally required knock and announce rule in executing a ... (Read 90 times)

penguins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
If police deliberately violate the constitutionally required knock and announce rule in executing a search warrant, evidence seized from the search is admissible.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ), Justice Cardozo ruled that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment did not apply in a state case because it was a mere _____________ right.
 
  Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



adammoses97

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
Answer to Question 1

TRUE Hudson v. Michigan (2006 )

Answer to Question 2

formal .
COMMENT: The question is not picky, because it contrasts a formal to a fundamental right



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen in water (H2O) is 2:1.

Did you know?

The average human gut is home to perhaps 500 to 1,000 different species of bacteria.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with introducing the words "anesthesia" and "anesthetic" into the English language in 1846.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library