This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which statement about the knock and announce rule is INACCURATE A. It is deemed an essential part ... (Read 25 times)

CharlieWard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 578
Which statement about the knock and announce rule is INACCURATE
 
  A. It is deemed an essential part of the Fourth Amendment
  B. Evidence is admissible even if the rule is violated
  C. A reasonable delay between police announcing their presence and breaking in a door is
  measured by the time it takes for a person to get to the door.
  D. A court cannot automatically grant no-knock warrants in all drug cases

Question 2

There is evidence that hacker groups from Muslim majority nations are hacking to facilitate a religious or political agenda.
 
  a. True
  b. False



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Joy Chen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 354
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

a




CharlieWard

  • Member
  • Posts: 578
Reply 2 on: Aug 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


ecabral0

  • Member
  • Posts: 310
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Certain topical medications such as clotrimazole and betamethasone are not approved for use in children younger than 12 years of age. They must be used very cautiously, as directed by a doctor, to treat any child. Children have a much greater response to topical steroid medications.

Did you know?

In the United States, congenital cytomegalovirus causes one child to become disabled almost every hour. CMV is the leading preventable viral cause of development disability in newborns. These disabilities include hearing or vision loss, and cerebral palsy.

Did you know?

The newest statin drug, rosuvastatin, has been called a superstatin because it appears to reduce LDL cholesterol to a greater degree than the other approved statin drugs.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

In the United States, an estimated 50 million unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed for viral respiratory infections.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library