This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In which cases did the Supreme Court declare the inadvertency is not a requirement for a valid plain ... (Read 99 times)

ARLKQ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
In which cases did the Supreme Court declare the inadvertency is not a requirement for a valid plain view seizure?
 
  A) Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  B) Horton v. California
  C) Minnesota v. Dickerson
  D) Arizona v. Hicks

Question 2

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that police officers can stop and detain motorists in their vehicles with articulable and reasonable suspicion?
 
  a. Terry v. Ohio
  b. Pennsylvania v. Mimms
  c. Delaware v. Prouse
  d. Maryland v. Buie



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

JaynaD87

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

c




ARLKQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 571
Reply 2 on: Aug 24, 2018
:D TYSM


Jsherida

  • Member
  • Posts: 314
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

In 1844, Charles Goodyear obtained the first patent for a rubber condom.

Did you know?

About 3% of all pregnant women will give birth to twins, which is an increase in rate of nearly 60% since the early 1980s.

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

Since 1988, the CDC has reported a 99% reduction in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, due to the introduction of the vaccine against it.

Did you know?

Blood is approximately twice as thick as water because of the cells and other components found in it.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library