This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The maximum number of moles of water that can be produced from 0.5 moles of C3H8O is ________. 2 ... (Read 96 times)

saliriagwu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
The maximum number of moles of water that can be produced from 0.5 moles of C3H8O is ________.
 
  2 C3H8O + 9 O2  6 CO2 + 8 H2O
  A) 0.5
  B) 2
  C) 4
  D) 8

Question 2

The solubility of SrF2 in water (given Ksp = 2.6  10-9 ) is ________.
 
  A) 4.3  10-4 M
  B) 1.2  10-4 M
  C) 7.6  10-5 M
  D) 8.7  10-4 M



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ally

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

D




saliriagwu

  • Member
  • Posts: 537
Reply 2 on: Aug 27, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


mjenn52

  • Member
  • Posts: 351
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

Did you know?

Only 12 hours after an egg cell is fertilized by a sperm cell, the egg cell starts to divide. As it continues to divide, it moves along the fallopian tube toward the uterus at about 1 inch per day.

Did you know?

As the western states of America were settled, pioneers often had to drink rancid water from ponds and other sources. This often resulted in chronic diarrhea, causing many cases of dehydration and death that could have been avoided if clean water had been available.

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library