This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Poverty is more likely to affect children of color, as shown by the fact that 34 of poor children ... (Read 91 times)

nautica902

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
Poverty is more likely to affect children of color, as shown by the fact that 34 of poor children are ___________ and 39 of poor children are _______.
 
  a. African American; Hispanic and Native American
  b. Non-Hispanic white; Hispanic and Native American
  c. Hispanic and Native American; African American
  d. Hispanic alone; African American

Question 2

The number of women who have young children and work outside the home has continued to increase, and in part this is due to
 
  a. a shift in family policy.
 b. an increase in housing costs.
 c. the increasing desire of women to have a career.
 d. the idea that children do better in preschool than at home.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kthug

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

a




kthug

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332

 

Did you know?

The first oncogene was discovered in 1970 and was termed SRC (pronounced "SARK").

Did you know?

Excessive alcohol use costs the country approximately $235 billion every year.

Did you know?

People who have myopia, or nearsightedness, are not able to see objects at a distance but only up close. It occurs when the cornea is either curved too steeply, the eye is too long, or both. This condition is progressive and worsens with time. More than 100 million people in the United States are nearsighted, but only 20% of those are born with the condition. Diet, eye exercise, drug therapy, and corrective lenses can all help manage nearsightedness.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library