Author Question: Mr. and Mrs. H were induced to sign a mortgage in favour of M Co. Ltd. by Johnston, a man living ... (Read 27 times)

WWatsford · **on:** Aug 7, 2021

Mr. and Mrs. H were induced to sign a mortgage in favour of M Co. Ltd. by Johnston, a man living with their daughter. Johnston led them to believe that the document was an unimportant amendment to an existing mortgage, when in reality it was a second substantial mortgage of their home. Neither read the document nor questioned it. When the payments were in arrears, the mortgagee took an action for foreclosure (to take Mr. and Mrs. H's home). Which of the following is correct with respect to the legal position of the parties?
◦ If the court finds that this is an example of duress by Johnston, Mr. and Mrs. H will not have to honour the mortgage.
◦ If Mr. and Mrs. H can show they didn't read the document, they will not have to honour the mortgage contract.
◦ Mr. and Mrs. H will likely have to honour the mortgage contract even though they didn't read it.
◦ If the court finds that Johnston has committed a fraudulent misrepresentation, Mr. and Mrs. H will not have to honour the mortgage.
◦ If the court finds that this is an example of undue influence by Johnston, Mr. and Mrs. H will not have to honour the mortgage.

voltaire123 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 7, 2021

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 64% of students answer this correctly