Len's new secretary asked him to sign four letters that she said ...

[rayancarla1]

Len's new secretary asked him to sign four letters that she said concerned general office matters. One of the "letters" was, in fact, a cheque for $500, payable to the secretary. The secretary cashed the cheque at her bank, and when her bank presented the cheque for payment, Len refused to pay it. He said he had been tricked and it was all a mistake. On these facts, which of the following is true?
◦ Len may be able to avoid his obligation on the cheque on the basis of non est factum.
◦ Len would be obligated to honour the cheque no matter how careful he had been.
◦ Len may be able to avoid his obligation on the cheque on the basis of duress.
◦ Even if Len had been careless, he will not have to honour the cheque.
◦ Len may be able to avoid his obligation on the cheque on the basis of unconscionability.

[peter]

A FREE account is required to view all solutions! Click to Register

Login with Facebook Login with Google Login with Email

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 44% of students answer this correctly

[rayancarla1]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[connor417]

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review