Author Question: Which of the following is correct with respect to restrictive covenants included in employment contracts? (Read 226 times)

yoroshambo · **on:** Aug 7, 2021

Question 1

When another employer induces someone to leave her current employment, which of the following actions might the current employer pursue?
◦ action for unfair competition
◦ action for inducing breach of contract
◦ action for theft
◦ action for breach of fiduciary duty
◦ action for breach of confidentiality

Question 2

Which of the following is correct with respect to restrictive covenants included in employment contracts?
◦ For such a clause to be valid, it is only necessary to show that it was needed to protect the employer's interest.
◦ The imposition of such a restriction is at the option of the employer and the employee has no say in the matter.
◦ Such restrictive covenants are always void and have no place in employment contracts.
◦ When employers require employees to enter into such agreements long after the initial hiring, it becomes part of the initial employment contract and does not require new consideration.
◦ Such restrictive covenants are enforceable in court if reasonable in that they are necessary to protect the employer's interests and go no further than necessary to achieve that goal.

Amiracle · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 7, 2021

A FREE account is required to view all solutions!

Lorsum iprem. Lorsus sur ipci. Lorsem sur iprem. Lorsum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipci. Lorsum sur iprium, valum sur ipci et, vala sur ipci. Lorsem sur ipci, lorsa sur iprem. Valus sur ipdi. Lorsus sur iprium nunc, valem sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsum sur iprium. Valem sur ipdi. Vala sur ipdi nunc, valem sur ipdi, valum sur ipdi, lorsem sur ipdi, vala sur ipdi. Valem sur iprem nunc, lorsa sur iprium. Valum sur ipdi et, lorsus sur ipci. Valem sur iprem. Valem sur ipci. Lorsa sur iprium. Lorsem sur ipci, valus sur iprem. Lorsem sur iprem nunc, valus sur iprium.

Answer Preview

Only 39% of students answer this correctly