In South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning federal and state regulation of Alaska timber processing, the Supreme Court held:
a. Congress may limit interstate commerce however it wishes
b. Congress may limit interstate commerce only with approval of the affected states
c. Congress may not regulate intrastate commerce, if the effect is inherently uncompetitive d. States may place substantial burdens on interstate commerce
e. none of the other choices
Question 2
In South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning federal and state regulation of Alaska timber processing, the Supreme Court held:
a. Congress may limit interstate commerce however it wishes
b. Congress may limit interstate commerce only with approval of the affected states
c. Congress may not regulate intrastate commerce, if the effect is inherently uncompetitive d. Congress may burden interstate commerce, but states may not unless allowed by Congress
e. States may place substantial burdens on interstate commerce so long as it advances a significant state interest
During the Pullman strike in Chicago, workers protesting wage cuts did $340,000 in property damage,
Blood coagulation pathways in vivo showing the central role played by thrombin
Effect of Increasing the Investment Rate on the Steady State
Child Development: Principles and Perspectives
Negative Feedback Regulation of BP
Development of a frog, animated and pictures