This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Carrying capacity is lower for hunter-gatherers than for agriculturists because a. their death ... (Read 33 times)

renzo156

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 526
Carrying capacity is lower for hunter-gatherers than for agriculturists because
 
  a. their death rates are higher.
  b. they use the land extensively rather than intensively.
  c. they have fewer technological skills.
  d. birth rates regularly exceeded death rates.

Question 2

The world's population at the time of the Agricultural (Neolithic) Revolution was approximately
 
  a. 4 million.
  b. 40 million.
  c. 400 million.
  d. 4 billion.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

SeanoH09

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A




renzo156

  • Member
  • Posts: 526
Reply 2 on: Jul 2, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


atrochim

  • Member
  • Posts: 331
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

According to the CDC, approximately 31.7% of the U.S. population has high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or "bad cholesterol" levels.

Did you know?

More than 2,500 barbiturates have been synthesized. At the height of their popularity, about 50 were marketed for human use.

Did you know?

The most destructive flu epidemic of all times in recorded history occurred in 1918, with approximately 20 million deaths worldwide.

Did you know?

The National Institutes of Health have supported research into acupuncture. This has shown that acupuncture significantly reduced pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, when used as a complement to conventional therapies.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library