This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What would happen to a forest without the action of decomposers? A) Many plant and animal species ... (Read 18 times)

jace

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
What would happen to a forest without the action of decomposers?
 
  A) Many plant and animal species would likely die out.
  B) Nutrients would no longer be recycled.
  C) Organic debris would accumulate and block sunlight from only the tallest of plant organisms.
  D) all of the above

Question 2

How does an atom's electronegativity relate to its ability to become oxidized?
 
  A) The greater the electronegativity of an atom, the greater its ability to become oxidized.
  B) The lower the electronegativity of an atom, the lower its ability to become oxidized.
  C) The greater the electronegativity of an atom, the lower its ability to become oxidized.
  D) Electronegativity does not effect the atom's ability to become oxidized.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

princessflame2016

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

C




jace

  • Member
  • Posts: 541
Reply 2 on: Aug 27, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


aruss1303

  • Member
  • Posts: 314
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

Adults are resistant to the bacterium that causes Botulism. These bacteria thrive in honey – therefore, honey should never be given to infants since their immune systems are not yet resistant.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library