Author Question: Sarah is a 27-year-old graduate student pursuing a master's degree in political science. She has ... (Read 128 times)

maychende

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
Sarah is a 27-year-old graduate student pursuing a master's degree in political science.
 
  She has never purchased health insurance for herself and, frankly, would prefer not to, given that she has enjoyed good health and would like to avoid paying insurance premiums. If she chose not to purchase insurance in 2014, what would be the likely consequence?
 
  a. She will be fined by the federal government.
  b. She will not face any consequences; there is no legal requirement for purchasing health insurance.
  c. She will receive a warning letter from the federal government. If she still does not have insurance in one year, she could face minor criminal charges.
  d. She will be fined by the state government.

Question 2

Discuss the historical trend of regulation in the United States. Why do we regulate the economy and economic sectors, and are there any associated costs? Should the United States continue the identified trend? Why or why not?
 
  Answer:



dajones82

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Answer to Question 1

Answer: a

Answer to Question 2

An ideal response will:
1. Assert that the historical trend has been one of increasing regulation across an expanding spectrum of sectors.
2. Explain how free market systems can create unfair advantages for certain industries that try to gain control of their sector of the market, and therefore, regulations have a public benefit.
3. Discuss the nature of some of those benefits, including but not limited to better working conditions, cleaner environments, safer consumer products, and increased economic competition.
4. Describe how regulations often have a negative effect on business, including increasing the costs for business in terms of labor, materials, and compliance.
5. In the context of the first point, make a strong claim as to whether that trajectory should continue, specifically connecting either the aforementioned costs or benefits to this argument.
6. Provide a concise and effective conclusion.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

The first successful kidney transplant was performed in 1954 and occurred in Boston. A kidney from an identical twin was transplanted into his dying brother's body and was not rejected because it did not appear foreign to his body.

Did you know?

A good example of polar molecules can be understood when trying to make a cake. If water and oil are required, they will not mix together. If you put them into a measuring cup, the oil will rise to the top while the water remains on the bottom.

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

The average person is easily confused by the terms pharmaceutics and pharmacology, thinking they are one and the same. Whereas pharmaceutics is the science of preparing and dispensing drugs (otherwise known as the science of pharmacy), pharmacology is the study of medications.

Did you know?

Vaccines cause herd immunity. If the majority of people in a community have been vaccinated against a disease, an unvaccinated person is less likely to get the disease since others are less likely to become sick from it and spread the disease.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library