In a study by O'Neill and Gopnik (1991), 4- and 5-year-olds were able to describe what was in a tunnel and how they knew what was in the tunnel. Three-year-olds were not as able to identify the sources of their knowledge as evidenced by which of the following?
a. The children could not identify what was in the tunnel.
b. Many children identified a ball in the tunnel when there was none.
c. Some children identified a ball as blue after feeling it but not seeing it.
d. Some children reported seeing things in the tunnel that were not there.
Question 2
A control group in an experiment receives the experimental treatment.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The phosphorus cycle. Numbers are 1012 g P or fluxes as 1012 g P per year (data from Schlesinger 199
Reindeer antlers grow again each year under a layer of fur called velvet. This reindeer is losing th
Eighteen-year-olds were the largest age cohort in the first year of the war in both armies. Soldiers
The areas in which reading-associated increases in activity were observed in the fMRI study of ...
Results from Kliegl's study show that older adults can learn complex information-processing
Describe the Conceptual Forecasting Framework in your own words.