Author Question: In a study by O'Neill and Gopnik (1991), 4- and 5-year-olds were able to describe what was in a ... (Read 279 times)

Yi-Chen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 550
In a study by O'Neill and Gopnik (1991), 4- and 5-year-olds were able to describe what was in a tunnel and how they knew what was in the tunnel. Three-year-olds were not as able to identify the sources of their knowledge as evidenced by which of the following?
 
  a. The children could not identify what was in the tunnel.
  b. Many children identified a ball in the tunnel when there was none.
  c. Some children identified a ball as blue after feeling it but not seeing it.
  d. Some children reported seeing things in the tunnel that were not there.

Question 2

A control group in an experiment receives the experimental treatment.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



daiying98

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 354
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

F



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

Did you know?

Adults are resistant to the bacterium that causes Botulism. These bacteria thrive in honey – therefore, honey should never be given to infants since their immune systems are not yet resistant.

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) in overdose can seriously damage the liver. It should never be taken by people who use alcohol heavily; it can result in severe liver damage and even a condition requiring a liver transplant.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library