Author Question: What does the Court focus on in finding the meeting attendance rule ... (Read 64 times)

joesmith1212 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

What does the Court focus on in finding the meeting attendance rule invalid?

Question 2

Marion orally agrees to sell Ashley her condominium in Philadelphia for 700,000 . The parties have known each other for 20 years and do not bother to put anything in writing. Based on the agreement, Marion hires a moving company to pack up all her goods and move them to a storage warehouse. Ashley shows up with a cashier's check, and Marion says, You're going to love it here.. But at the last minute, Marion declines to take the check and refuses to sell. Ashley sues and wins
a. Nothing
b. The condominium
c. 700,000
d. The difference between 700,000 and the condominium's market value
e. Damages for fraud

vboyd24 · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

The Court focuses on the effect of the meeting attendance rule, which in this case excluded 96.5 percent of the union members from holding office.

Answer to Question 2

.A