Author Question: Did the ILA prove that the invocation of the Taft-Hartley Act was the product of collusion between ... (Read 106 times)

nenivikky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Did the ILA prove that the invocation of the Taft-Hartley Act was the product of collusion between the United States and the PMA?

Question 2

Probable cause means
 a. Substantial evidence that the person signing the affidavit has legitimate reasons for requesting the warrant.
  b. Substantial likelihood that a crime has taken place or is about to take place.
  c. Trustworthy evidence that the victim of the search is known to have criminal tendencies.
  d. That based on all of the information presented it is likely that evidence of crime will be found in the place mentioned.



medine

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

The court dismissed this assertion as speculation. Moreover, the court pointed out that both the ILA and the PMA have the constitutional right to petition the government for redress of grievance.

Answer to Question 2

.D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

In women, pharmacodynamic differences include increased sensitivity to (and increased effectiveness of) beta-blockers, opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and typical antipsychotics.

Did you know?

Approximately one in three babies in the United States is now delivered by cesarean section. The number of cesarean sections in the United States has risen 46% since 1996.

Did you know?

Cocaine was isolated in 1860 and first used as a local anesthetic in 1884. Its first clinical use was by Sigmund Freud to wean a patient from morphine addiction. The fictional character Sherlock Holmes was supposed to be addicted to cocaine by injection.

Did you know?

The horizontal fraction bar was introduced by the Arabs.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library