In Callison v. City of Philadelphia, Callison claimed his ...

[frankwu]

In Callison v. City of Philadelphia, Callison claimed his employer violated his FMLA rights by insisting he be at home during regular working hours while on leave, or call in to say where he was going. The appeals court held that the employer only had the right to make sure he was not working elsewhere, otherwise it had no right to control his location.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In Hinson v. N&W Construction, where Hinson submitted the low bid to N&W for plumbing work to be part of a larger construction project by N&W, but then refused to do the work when construction was started by N&W, the court held that Hinson:
 a. could not be relied upon by N&W because he was not licensed for such work
  b. was not liable because there was no consideration paid by N&W to create a contract c. was liable to N&W for the value of the contract based on a breach of contract
  d. was not liable because there was not a contract due to lack of proper acceptance by N&W
  e. none of the other choices

[jamesnevil303]

Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

e

[frankwu]

TYSM

[ghepp]

Gracias!