In the 1913 case Mazetti v. Armour, the court held that privity ...

[bobbie]

In the 1913 case Mazetti v. Armour, the court held that privity of contract had to be proved before a plaintiff could sue a food company for breach of warranty in a product defect case.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

A(n) ______ is when a buyer agrees to take all of the output of a certain seller.
 a. output contract
  b. input contract
  c. requirements contract d. total contract
  e. complete sale contract

[essyface1]

Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

a

[bobbie]

TYSM

[CAPTAINAMERICA]

Excellent