Author Question: In the 1913 case Mazetti v. Armour, the court held that privity of contract had to be proved before ... (Read 99 times)

bobbie · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

In the 1913 case Mazetti v. Armour, the court held that privity of contract had to be proved before a plaintiff could sue a food company for breach of warranty in a product defect case.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

A(n) ______ is when a buyer agrees to take all of the output of a certain seller.
a. output contract
b. input contract
c. requirements contract d. total contract
e. complete sale contract