[Answered] Nonconsequentialist theories of ethics never consider the consequences of an action or rule when ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Nonconsequentialist theories of ethics never consider the consequences of an action or rule when ... (Read 82 times)

V@ndy87

Hero Member
Posts: 571

on: Jun 19, 2018

Nonconsequentialist theories of ethics never consider the consequences of an action or rule when making a moral
judgment.

a. True
b. False

Question 2

According to W. D. Ross, we have immediate intuitive knowledge of the basic prima facie moral
obligations/principles.

a. True
b. False

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

IAPPLET

Sr. Member
Posts: 333

Reply #1 on: Jun 19, 2018

Answer to Question 1

False

Answer to Question 2

True

V@ndy87

Hero Member
Posts: 571

Reply #2 on: Jun 19, 2018

Thank you!

IAPPLET

Sr. Member
Posts: 333

Reply #3 on: Jun 19, 2018

Happy to help

« previous next »

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

Approximately 500,000 babies are born each year in the United States to teenage mothers.

Did you know?

The average older adult in the United States takes five prescription drugs per day. Half of these drugs contain a sedative. Alcohol should therefore be avoided by most senior citizens because of the dangerous interactions between alcohol and sedatives.

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."