This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Nonconsequentialist theories of ethics never consider the consequences of an action or rule when ... (Read 124 times)

V@ndy87

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571

Nonconsequentialist theories of ethics never consider the consequences of an action or rule when making a moral
  judgment.


 
 

a. True
  b. False



Question 2

According to W. D. Ross, we have immediate intuitive knowledge of the basic prima facie moral
  obligations/principles.


 
 

a. True
  b. False




Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

IAPPLET

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
Answer to Question 1

False

Answer to Question 2

True





 

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

Did you know?

The ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen in water (H2O) is 2:1.

Did you know?

Symptoms of kidney problems include a loss of appetite, back pain (which may be sudden and intense), chills, abdominal pain, fluid retention, nausea, the urge to urinate, vomiting, and fever.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library