What do Desjardins and Duska say about the Harm Argument?
a. There is very little evidence that drug use causes harm.
b. The harm argument could justify drug use in occupations in which the
potential for harm is clear and present.
c. The possibility of harm does not warrant the actual invasion of privacy that
results from mandatory drug testing.
d. All o the above
Question 2What do Desjardins and Duska say about drug testing and productivity?
a. They argue that drug use lowers productivity and therefore employers are
justified in conducting randomized drug tests.
b. They argue that drug use has no impact on productivity and therefore
employers are not justified in conducting randomized drug test.
c. They argue that unless employers can establish a conclusive link between
drug use and productivity, randomized drug tests are immoral.
d. They argue that use of drugs is irrelevant; if an employees productivity is
unsatisfactory, the employee should be terminated for poor work
performance and not for testing positive for drugs.
Skin signs are objective evidence of an illness or disorder. They can be seen, measured, or felt.
The overlapping relationship among research, evidence-based practice
The Krapina remains may provide evidence of cannibalism by some Neadertals.
Evidence of Creep
The evidence of metabolites from gut microbiota.
Evidence of early bipedalism