What do Desjardins and Duska say about the Harm Argument?
a. There is very little evidence that drug use causes harm.
b. The harm argument could justify drug use in occupations in which the
potential for harm is clear and present.
c. The possibility of harm does not warrant the actual invasion of privacy that
results from mandatory drug testing.
d. All o the above
Question 2What do Desjardins and Duska say about drug testing and productivity?
a. They argue that drug use lowers productivity and therefore employers are
justified in conducting randomized drug tests.
b. They argue that drug use has no impact on productivity and therefore
employers are not justified in conducting randomized drug test.
c. They argue that unless employers can establish a conclusive link between
drug use and productivity, randomized drug tests are immoral.
d. They argue that use of drugs is irrelevant; if an employees productivity is
unsatisfactory, the employee should be terminated for poor work
performance and not for testing positive for drugs.
Evidence that the ATP synthase is a rotary machine
Evidence-based practice: skin assessment
Evidence of Creep
Evidence of Retrieval of Visual Memories of Movement
Common skin signs are often evidence of an illness or disorder. A fissure is a crack-like sore or ...
Experimental evidence of cytoplasmic localization in an amphibian oocyte.