This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: How does optimization in levels differ from optimization in differences? Assume that the city ... (Read 241 times)

SGallaher96

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
How does optimization in levels differ from optimization in differences? Assume that the city council has to choose one among the following three alternatives: setting up a school, setting up a hospital, and setting up a playground.
 
  The estimates of expected cost and benefit of all three projects are shown in the following table. How does the city council arrive at the optimal choice if both the techniques of optimization are implemented? Do the results vary?
 
  Project Cost () Benefit ()
  Playground 15,000 30,000
  School 20,000 50,000
  Hospital 50,000 75,000

Question 2

Refer to the above figure. At the initial long-run equilibrium, the price level is ________, and the price level will be ________.
 
  A) 20; 40 B) 20; 45 C) 40; 45 D) 20; 20



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

momtoalll

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
Answer to Question 1

The basic difference between the two techniques is that optimization in levels estimates the total net benefits of different alternatives before arriving at the optimum decision, whereas optimization in differences estimates the change in net benefits when the decision maker shifts from one alternative to another.

Net benefit of setting up a school = 50,000 - 20,000 = 30,000

Net benefit of setting up a hospital = 75,000 - 50,000 = 25,000

Net benefit of setting up a playground = 30,000 - 15,000 = 15,000

Optimization in levels compares the net benefit of all alternatives before arriving at an optimum. The net benefit of setting up a school is the highest among all three alternatives, hence it is the optimum decision when optimizing in levels.

Optimization in differences compares the change in net benefit when switching from an alternative to another.
If the city council chooses to set up a school over setting up a playground, change in net benefit = 30,000 - 15,000 = 15,000
If the city council chooses to build a hospital over setting up a playground, change in net benefit = 25,000 - 15,000 = 10,000.
Therefore, setting up a playground is not the optimum choice.
Instead of a hospital, if a school is built, change in net benefit = 30,000 - 25,000 = 5,000.
Because the change in net benefit when switching from hospital to school is positive, setting up a school is a better option between the two. Hence, setting up a school is the optimum decision among the three alternatives when optimizing in differences. We can see that both the techniques suggest that building a school is the optimum choice.

Answer to Question 2

D




SGallaher96

  • Member
  • Posts: 509
Reply 2 on: Jun 30, 2018
Excellent


Viet Thy

  • Member
  • Posts: 329
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

More than 50% of American adults have oral herpes, which is commonly known as "cold sores" or "fever blisters." The herpes virus can be active on the skin surface without showing any signs or causing any symptoms.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) in overdose can seriously damage the liver. It should never be taken by people who use alcohol heavily; it can result in severe liver damage and even a condition requiring a liver transplant.

Did you know?

More than 20 million Americans cite use of marijuana within the past 30 days, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). More than 8 million admit to using it almost every day.

Did you know?

Each year in the United States, there are approximately six million pregnancies. This means that at any one time, about 4% of women in the United States are pregnant.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library