Author Question: How does optimization in levels differ from optimization in differences? Assume that the city ... (Read 249 times)

SGallaher96 · **on:** Jun 30, 2018

How does optimization in levels differ from optimization in differences? Assume that the city council has to choose one among the following three alternatives: setting up a school, setting up a hospital, and setting up a playground.

The estimates of expected cost and benefit of all three projects are shown in the following table. How does the city council arrive at the optimal choice if both the techniques of optimization are implemented? Do the results vary?

Project Cost () Benefit ()
Playground 15,000 30,000
School 20,000 50,000
Hospital 50,000 75,000

Question 2

Refer to the above figure. At the initial long-run equilibrium, the price level is ________, and the price level will be ________.

A) 20; 40 B) 20; 45 C) 40; 45 D) 20; 20

momtoalll · **Reply #1 on:** Jun 30, 2018

Answer to Question 1

The basic difference between the two techniques is that optimization in levels estimates the total net benefits of different alternatives before arriving at the optimum decision, whereas optimization in differences estimates the change in net benefits when the decision maker shifts from one alternative to another.

Net benefit of setting up a school = 50,000 - 20,000 = 30,000

Net benefit of setting up a hospital = 75,000 - 50,000 = 25,000

Net benefit of setting up a playground = 30,000 - 15,000 = 15,000

Optimization in levels compares the net benefit of all alternatives before arriving at an optimum. The net benefit of setting up a school is the highest among all three alternatives, hence it is the optimum decision when optimizing in levels.

Optimization in differences compares the change in net benefit when switching from an alternative to another.
If the city council chooses to set up a school over setting up a playground, change in net benefit = 30,000 - 15,000 = 15,000
If the city council chooses to build a hospital over setting up a playground, change in net benefit = 25,000 - 15,000 = 10,000.
Therefore, setting up a playground is not the optimum choice.
Instead of a hospital, if a school is built, change in net benefit = 30,000 - 25,000 = 5,000.
Because the change in net benefit when switching from hospital to school is positive, setting up a school is a better option between the two. Hence, setting up a school is the optimum decision among the three alternatives when optimizing in differences. We can see that both the techniques suggest that building a school is the optimum choice.

Answer to Question 2

D