This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the Wabash case (1886), the Supreme Court held that: a. states cannot enact laws that interfere ... (Read 47 times)

RYAN BANYAN

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
In the Wabash case (1886), the Supreme Court held that:
 a. states cannot enact laws that interfere with interstate commerce.
  b. states could restrict price-discrimination based on person, but not price-discrimination based on place.
  c. states could regulate railroad rates on long-hauls, but not rates on short-hauls.
  d. held that railroad practices could not be regulated by any federal or state governing body.

Question 2

Granger laws:
 a. were severely limited in scope through litigation.
  b. generally outlawed both place and person discrimination.
  c. established commissions with the power to investigate complaints.
  d. All of the above are correct.
  e. Only a and b are correct.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

dreamfighter72

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 355
Answer to Question 1

a. states cannot enact laws that interfere with interstate commerce.

Answer to Question 2

d. All of the above are correct.




RYAN BANYAN

  • Member
  • Posts: 563
Reply 2 on: Jun 30, 2018
Gracias!


lcapri7

  • Member
  • Posts: 350
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Calcitonin is a naturally occurring hormone. In women who are at least 5 years beyond menopause, it slows bone loss and increases spinal bone density.

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

In 1885, the Lloyd Manufacturing Company of Albany, New York, promoted and sold "Cocaine Toothache Drops" at 15 cents per bottle! In 1914, the Harrison Narcotic Act brought the sale and distribution of this drug under federal control.

Did you know?

When intravenous medications are involved in adverse drug events, their harmful effects may occur more rapidly, and be more severe than errors with oral medications. This is due to the direct administration into the bloodstream.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library