This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: How does the case study method differ from the observational method? What will be an ideal ... (Read 150 times)

naturalchemist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 542
How does the case study method differ from the observational method?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Because research is ____, one study often becomes the basis for others.
 
  a. empirical
 b. not static
 c. error prone
  d. public



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

josephsuarez

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

The case study method involves making an in-depth study of one or more individuals in the hope of revealing things that are true of all of us. This differs from the observational method in that this method simply involves observing humans or other animals. Thus, the case study method has slightly more control, but less flexibility. In addition, the case study method often involves smaller sample sizes (sometimes only one person) than the observational method.

Answer to Question 2

b




naturalchemist

  • Member
  • Posts: 542
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


Hdosisshsbshs

  • Member
  • Posts: 315
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Atropine was named after the Greek goddess Atropos, the oldest and ugliest of the three sisters known as the Fates, who controlled the destiny of men.

Did you know?

Asthma occurs in one in 11 children and in one in 12 adults. African Americans and Latinos have a higher risk for developing asthma than other groups.

Did you know?

In 2010, opiate painkllers, such as morphine, OxyContin®, and Vicodin®, were tied to almost 60% of drug overdose deaths.

Did you know?

Persons who overdose with cardiac glycosides have a better chance of overall survival if they can survive the first 24 hours after the overdose.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library