Author Question: What is the benefit of having subordinates evaluate supervisors? A) increasing the opportunity to ... (Read 50 times)

craiczarry

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
What is the benefit of having subordinates evaluate supervisors?
 
  A) increasing the opportunity to expand a department
  B) decreasing the reliance on traditional performance appraisals
  C) increasing a supervisor's awareness of the work group's needs
  D) decreasing a supervisor's authority over subordinates in a work group

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT an advantage associated with using team members to appraise performance?
 
  A) Team members are familiar with each other's performance.
  B) Team members are receptive to criticism from co-workers.
  C) Peer review relies on more than one opinion.
  D) Peer pressure motivates members of a team.



durant1234

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Answer to Question 1

Answer: C

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Cytomegalovirus affects nearly the same amount of newborns every year as Down syndrome.

Did you know?

Opium has influenced much of the world's most popular literature. The following authors were all opium users, of varying degrees: Lewis Carroll, Charles, Dickens, Arthur Conan Doyle, and Oscar Wilde.

Did you know?

Nearly all drugs pass into human breast milk. How often a drug is taken influences the amount of drug that will pass into the milk. Medications taken 30 to 60 minutes before breastfeeding are likely to be at peak blood levels when the baby is nursing.

Did you know?

Hip fractures are the most serious consequences of osteoporosis. The incidence of hip fractures increases with each decade among patients in their 60s to patients in their 90s for both women and men of all populations. Men and women older than 80 years of age show the highest incidence of hip fractures.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library