Author Question: Which of the following is an example of a systematic review? A) An RCT study published in the ... (Read 48 times)

colton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
Which of the following is an example of a systematic review?
 
  A) An RCT study published in the journal Nursing Research
  B) A meta-analysis from the Cochrane database
  C) A synopsis published in Evidence-Based Nursing
  D) A clinical practice guideline from the National Guideline Clearinghouse

Question 2

Which statement most accurately describes the relationship between reliability and validity of a measurement instrument?
 
  1. A measure cannot be reliable unless it is valid.
  2. As reliability increases, validity decreases.
  3. A measure cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
  4. As validity increases reliability decreases.



kaylee05

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

B
Feedback:
A meta-analysis is a type of systematic review and a technique for integrating quantitative research findings statistically. In essence, meta-analysis treats the findings from a study as one piece of information. The findings from multiple studies on the same topic are combined and then all of the information is analyzed statistically in a manner similar to that in a usual study. Unlike systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines (which often are based on systematic reviews) give specific recommendations for evidence-based decision-making. Guideline development typically involves the consensus of a group of researchers, experts, and clinicians. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an individual study that focuses on the effectiveness of therapies rather than on broader health-care interventions. Synopses, or summaries, of systematic reviews and of single studies are available in evidence-based abstract journals such as Evidence-Based Nursing.

Answer to Question 2

3
Rationale 1: The reliability of an instrument tells nothing about the degree of validity. An instrument can be very reliable, but have low validity.
Rationale 2: There is no evidence that increasing reliability decreases validity.
Rationale 3: Reliability of a measure is always considered first because reliability is a necessary condition for validity. An instrument cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
Rationale 4: There is no evidence that increasing validity decreases reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

As many as 28% of hospitalized patients requiring mechanical ventilators to help them breathe (for more than 48 hours) will develop ventilator-associated pneumonia. Current therapy involves intravenous antibiotics, but new antibiotics that can be inhaled (and more directly treat the infection) are being developed.

Did you know?

Though the United States has largely rejected the metric system, it is used for currency, as in 100 pennies = 1 dollar. Previously, the British currency system was used, with measurements such as 12 pence to the shilling, and 20 shillings to the pound.

Did you know?

Chronic necrotizing aspergillosis has a slowly progressive process that, unlike invasive aspergillosis, does not spread to other organ systems or the blood vessels. It most often affects middle-aged and elderly individuals, spreading to surrounding tissue in the lungs. The disease often does not respond to conventionally successful treatments, and requires individualized therapies in order to keep it from becoming life-threatening.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library