Author Question: Which of the following is an example of a systematic review? A) An RCT study published in the ... (Read 29 times)

colton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
Which of the following is an example of a systematic review?
 
  A) An RCT study published in the journal Nursing Research
  B) A meta-analysis from the Cochrane database
  C) A synopsis published in Evidence-Based Nursing
  D) A clinical practice guideline from the National Guideline Clearinghouse

Question 2

Which statement most accurately describes the relationship between reliability and validity of a measurement instrument?
 
  1. A measure cannot be reliable unless it is valid.
  2. As reliability increases, validity decreases.
  3. A measure cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
  4. As validity increases reliability decreases.



kaylee05

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

B
Feedback:
A meta-analysis is a type of systematic review and a technique for integrating quantitative research findings statistically. In essence, meta-analysis treats the findings from a study as one piece of information. The findings from multiple studies on the same topic are combined and then all of the information is analyzed statistically in a manner similar to that in a usual study. Unlike systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines (which often are based on systematic reviews) give specific recommendations for evidence-based decision-making. Guideline development typically involves the consensus of a group of researchers, experts, and clinicians. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an individual study that focuses on the effectiveness of therapies rather than on broader health-care interventions. Synopses, or summaries, of systematic reviews and of single studies are available in evidence-based abstract journals such as Evidence-Based Nursing.

Answer to Question 2

3
Rationale 1: The reliability of an instrument tells nothing about the degree of validity. An instrument can be very reliable, but have low validity.
Rationale 2: There is no evidence that increasing reliability decreases validity.
Rationale 3: Reliability of a measure is always considered first because reliability is a necessary condition for validity. An instrument cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
Rationale 4: There is no evidence that increasing validity decreases reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

Though Candida and Aspergillus species are the most common fungal pathogens causing invasive fungal disease in the immunocompromised, infections due to previously uncommon hyaline and dematiaceous filamentous fungi are occurring more often today. Rare fungal infections, once accurately diagnosed, may require surgical debridement, immunotherapy, and newer antifungals used singly or in combination with older antifungals, on a case-by-case basis.

Did you know?

Many of the drugs used by neuroscientists are derived from toxic plants and venomous animals (such as snakes, spiders, snails, and puffer fish).

Did you know?

Never take aspirin without food because it is likely to irritate your stomach. Never give aspirin to children under age 12. Overdoses of aspirin have the potential to cause deafness.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library