Author Question: Which of the following is an example of a systematic review? A) An RCT study published in the ... (Read 65 times)

colton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
Which of the following is an example of a systematic review?
 
  A) An RCT study published in the journal Nursing Research
  B) A meta-analysis from the Cochrane database
  C) A synopsis published in Evidence-Based Nursing
  D) A clinical practice guideline from the National Guideline Clearinghouse

Question 2

Which statement most accurately describes the relationship between reliability and validity of a measurement instrument?
 
  1. A measure cannot be reliable unless it is valid.
  2. As reliability increases, validity decreases.
  3. A measure cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
  4. As validity increases reliability decreases.



kaylee05

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

B
Feedback:
A meta-analysis is a type of systematic review and a technique for integrating quantitative research findings statistically. In essence, meta-analysis treats the findings from a study as one piece of information. The findings from multiple studies on the same topic are combined and then all of the information is analyzed statistically in a manner similar to that in a usual study. Unlike systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines (which often are based on systematic reviews) give specific recommendations for evidence-based decision-making. Guideline development typically involves the consensus of a group of researchers, experts, and clinicians. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an individual study that focuses on the effectiveness of therapies rather than on broader health-care interventions. Synopses, or summaries, of systematic reviews and of single studies are available in evidence-based abstract journals such as Evidence-Based Nursing.

Answer to Question 2

3
Rationale 1: The reliability of an instrument tells nothing about the degree of validity. An instrument can be very reliable, but have low validity.
Rationale 2: There is no evidence that increasing reliability decreases validity.
Rationale 3: Reliability of a measure is always considered first because reliability is a necessary condition for validity. An instrument cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
Rationale 4: There is no evidence that increasing validity decreases reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

Amphetamine poisoning can cause intravascular coagulation, circulatory collapse, rhabdomyolysis, ischemic colitis, acute psychosis, hyperthermia, respiratory distress syndrome, and pericarditis.

Did you know?

Cocaine was isolated in 1860 and first used as a local anesthetic in 1884. Its first clinical use was by Sigmund Freud to wean a patient from morphine addiction. The fictional character Sherlock Holmes was supposed to be addicted to cocaine by injection.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library