Author Question: Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting ... (Read 96 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting in a factional party?
 
  A) 1800
  B) 1912
  C) 1948
  D) 1968
  E) 2008

Question 2

Elections based on a plurality system discourage new parties from forming because
 
  A) a plurality system discourages patronage and reduces voter interest in joining a party.
  B) a plurality system requires parties to form alliances with other parties to win elections.
  C) under this winner-take-all system, parties must be broadly based in order to gain alliances and support.
  D) a plurality system requires each party to be as narrowly based as possible, leaving little room for new parties.
  E) a plurality system gives an advantage to savvy political unknowns who can grab the media spotlight.



zhanghao

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

Did you know?

Normal urine is sterile. It contains fluids, salts, and waste products. It is free of bacteria, viruses, and fungi.

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

Most strokes are caused when blood clots move to a blood vessel in the brain and block blood flow to that area. Thrombolytic therapy can be used to dissolve the clot quickly. If given within 3 hours of the first stroke symptoms, this therapy can help limit stroke damage and disability.

Did you know?

There are 60,000 miles of blood vessels in every adult human.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library