Author Question: Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting ... (Read 99 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting in a factional party?
 
  A) 1800
  B) 1912
  C) 1948
  D) 1968
  E) 2008

Question 2

Elections based on a plurality system discourage new parties from forming because
 
  A) a plurality system discourages patronage and reduces voter interest in joining a party.
  B) a plurality system requires parties to form alliances with other parties to win elections.
  C) under this winner-take-all system, parties must be broadly based in order to gain alliances and support.
  D) a plurality system requires each party to be as narrowly based as possible, leaving little room for new parties.
  E) a plurality system gives an advantage to savvy political unknowns who can grab the media spotlight.



zhanghao

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Green tea is able to stop the scent of garlic or onion from causing bad breath.

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library