This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In a 2003 case involving admissions practices at the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court ... (Read 44 times)

CBme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
In a 2003 case involving admissions practices at the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision in Bakke by rejecting the use of
 
  A) compelling state interests.
  B) an exact numerical advantage.
  C) a plus factor.
  D) a gender measure.
  E) an ethnic policy mark.

Question 2

In what case was it determined that any discrimination, even when its purpose is to help, must be subject to strict scrutiny?
 
  A) Adarand
  B) Bakke
  C) Plyler v. Doe
  D) United Steelworkers v. Weber
  E) Richmond v. Croson



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Mholman93

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A




CBme

  • Member
  • Posts: 548
Reply 2 on: Jul 9, 2018
Gracias!


miss.ashley

  • Member
  • Posts: 371
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

The horizontal fraction bar was introduced by the Arabs.

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

Did you know?

Between 1999 and 2012, American adults with high total cholesterol decreased from 18.3% to 12.9%

Did you know?

The training of an anesthesiologist typically requires four years of college, 4 years of medical school, 1 year of internship, and 3 years of residency.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library