This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In a 2003 case involving admissions practices at the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court ... (Read 42 times)

CBme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
In a 2003 case involving admissions practices at the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision in Bakke by rejecting the use of
 
  A) compelling state interests.
  B) an exact numerical advantage.
  C) a plus factor.
  D) a gender measure.
  E) an ethnic policy mark.

Question 2

In what case was it determined that any discrimination, even when its purpose is to help, must be subject to strict scrutiny?
 
  A) Adarand
  B) Bakke
  C) Plyler v. Doe
  D) United Steelworkers v. Weber
  E) Richmond v. Croson



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Mholman93

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A




CBme

  • Member
  • Posts: 548
Reply 2 on: Jul 9, 2018
Wow, this really help


duy1981999

  • Member
  • Posts: 341
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

Though “Krazy Glue” or “Super Glue” has the ability to seal small wounds, it is not recommended for this purpose since it contains many substances that should not enter the body through the skin, and may be harmful.

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

Approximately one in four people diagnosed with diabetes will develop foot problems. Of these, about one-third will require lower extremity amputation.

Did you know?

There are 60,000 miles of blood vessels in every adult human.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library