Author Question: When obtaining a history of a victim of a drug-/alcohol-related emergency, which of the following ... (Read 69 times)

09madisonrousseau09

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
When obtaining a history of a victim of a drug-/alcohol-related emergency, which of the following information is the least important?
 
  A) what was taken
  B) when was it taken
  C) age and weight of the victim
  D) how much was taken

Question 2

Which of the following is not a goal of First Aider crisis intervention when managing a drug/alcohol crisis?
 
  A) to create trust
  B) to lower anxiety
  C) to provide counseling
  D) to establish rapport



bassamabas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
Answer to Question 1

Answer: C

Answer to Question 2

Answer: C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

As many as 28% of hospitalized patients requiring mechanical ventilators to help them breathe (for more than 48 hours) will develop ventilator-associated pneumonia. Current therapy involves intravenous antibiotics, but new antibiotics that can be inhaled (and more directly treat the infection) are being developed.

Did you know?

People who have myopia, or nearsightedness, are not able to see objects at a distance but only up close. It occurs when the cornea is either curved too steeply, the eye is too long, or both. This condition is progressive and worsens with time. More than 100 million people in the United States are nearsighted, but only 20% of those are born with the condition. Diet, eye exercise, drug therapy, and corrective lenses can all help manage nearsightedness.

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library