Klenowski, Copes, Mullins, and Vieraitis's contend that when men ...

[hubes95]

Klenowski, Copes, Mullins, and Vieraitis's contend that when men used the claim of normality to explain their white-collar offenses they often invoked images of ____________.
 
  a. The need to make money for their family
  b. A dog eat dog world
  c. No one in the real world cares
  d. Their unfair selection in order for the government to make a point

Question 2

Klenowski, Copes, Mullins, and Vieraitis's state that male white-collar offenders that used ___________ justification all referred to either their impoverished upbringing or an unhealthy and / or abusive relationship with a parent.
 
  a. Appeal to Higher Loyalties
  b. Denial of Injury
  c. Claim of Normality
  d. Denial of Responsibility

[Tabitha_2016]

Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

d

[hubes95]

Excellent

[ryhom]

TYSM