Author Question: In a within-subjects design: a. larger effect sizes are needed to reject the null hypothesis. b. ... (Read 44 times)

shenderson6

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
In a within-subjects design:
 
  a. larger effect sizes are needed to reject the null hypothesis.
  b. smaller treatment differences are needed to reject the null hypothesis.
  c. a smaller F is needed to reject the null hypothesis.
  d. the variability of scores in each condition is reduced.

Question 2

In a within-subjects design, as compared to a between-subjects design, you are:
 
  a. less likely to reject the null hypothesis.
  b. more likely to make a Type II error.
  c. more likely to obtain a small F ratio.
  d. more likely to obtain a large F ratio.



Expo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

People with alcoholism are at a much greater risk of malnutrition than are other people and usually exhibit low levels of most vitamins (especially folic acid). This is because alcohol often takes the place of 50% of their daily intake of calories, with little nutritional value contained in it.

Did you know?

Despite claims by manufacturers, the supplement known as Ginkgo biloba was shown in a study of more than 3,000 participants to be ineffective in reducing development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in older people.

Did you know?

Pregnant women usually experience a heightened sense of smell beginning late in the first trimester. Some experts call this the body's way of protecting a pregnant woman from foods that are unsafe for the fetus.

Did you know?

Women are two-thirds more likely than men to develop irritable bowel syndrome. This may be attributable to hormonal changes related to their menstrual cycles.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library