Author Question: The first step in the calculation of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is to: a. ... (Read 90 times)

Mr. Wonderful

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 866
The first step in the calculation of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is to:
 
  a. determine the z score for each score on each variable.
  b. determine the cross-products of the z scores.
  c. multiply the z score for variable X by the z score for variable Y.
  d. divide the cross-products by N.

Question 2

To calculate the coefficient of determination, we:
 
  a. square the correlation coefficient.
  b. take the square root of the correlation coefficient.
  c. multiply the correlation coefficient by 2
  d. divide the correlation coefficient by 2



joneynes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 376
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The modern decimal position system was the invention of the Hindus (around 800 AD), involving the placing of numerals to indicate their value (units, tens, hundreds, and so on).

Did you know?

Always store hazardous household chemicals in their original containers out of reach of children. These include bleach, paint, strippers and products containing turpentine, garden chemicals, oven cleaners, fondue fuels, nail polish, and nail polish remover.

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

When intravenous medications are involved in adverse drug events, their harmful effects may occur more rapidly, and be more severe than errors with oral medications. This is due to the direct administration into the bloodstream.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library