This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The p value is not sufficient for indicating the importance of the outcome of a study. The reason ... (Read 55 times)

j.rubin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
The p value is not sufficient for indicating the importance of the outcome of a study. The reason for this is because
 
  a. p values are too small.
  b. the size of the study affects the p value.
  c. the magnitude of the test statistic must also be known.
  d. effect sizes are related to p values.

Question 2

The initials NHST stand for
 
  a. Normal HypothesiS Testing.
  b. Null HypothesiS Testing.
  c. Normal Hypothesis Significance Testing.
  d. Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

dudman123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

d





 

Did you know?

Approximately 25% of all reported medication errors result from some kind of name confusion.

Did you know?

Calcitonin is a naturally occurring hormone. In women who are at least 5 years beyond menopause, it slows bone loss and increases spinal bone density.

Did you know?

Drug abusers experience the following scenario: The pleasure given by their drug (or drugs) of choice is so strong that it is difficult to eradicate even after years of staying away from the substances involved. Certain triggers may cause a drug abuser to relapse. Research shows that long-term drug abuse results in significant changes in brain function that persist long after an individual stops using drugs. It is most important to realize that the same is true of not just illegal substances but alcohol and tobacco as well.

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library